CLASSIFIED Need to Know: Happy Times are Party Times - nothing to see here! #PoliticalSatire #DeepAIgeneratedImage Russian Interference UK politics Brexit voters 2016 Llewelyn Pritchard 28 November 2024
Perplexity:
‘ The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) report included several specific allegations of Russian interference in UK politics:
Disinformation campaigns: The report cited "credible open-source commentary" suggesting Russia sought to influence the 2014 Scottish independence referendum through online disinformation efforts 1 5.
Cyber attacks: The report mentioned Russian cyber attacks on UK infrastructure and institutions 1 5.
Financial influence: The report highlighted the influx of Russian money into the UK, particularly London, describing it as the "London 'laundromat'" for illicit finance 7 8.
Political donations: The report suggested that wealthy Russian business figures had made donations to UK political parties, particularly the Conservative party 2.
Targeting of the UK political elite: The report indicated that Russia had made overtures to multiple UK political parties and attempted to cultivate influential figures 2 5.
Espionage: The report mentioned traditional espionage activities by Russian intelligence services 1 5.
Assassination attempts: The report referenced the murder of Alexander Litvinenko and the Salisbury Novichok poisonings as examples of Russian aggression on UK soil 3 5.
Brexit referendum: While the report did not provide concrete evidence of interference in the 2016 EU referendum, it criticized the UK government for failing to investigate potential Russian meddling 1 2 3.
The report described these activities as part of a "whole of state" approach by Russia to undermine UK democratic processes and institutions’ 1 5.
‘Overall, the ISC report painted a picture of pervasive Russian influence across multiple sectors of UK society and politics, while criticizing the government's lack of action in addressing and investigating these threats’ 3 7.
Sources: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/1-explain-how-and-why-it-can-b-P8W.BdYnTH.KjYHLXz3VOA#5 https://www.perplexity.ai/search/1-explain-how-and-why-it-can-b-P8W.BdYnTH.KjYHLXz3VOA#6
‘The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) report strongly criticized the UK government's failure to thoroughly investigate Russian interference in British politics, particularly in the 2016 Brexit referendum. This lack of investigation has left the full extent of Russian influence unclear 1 4.
Key points from the report include:
The UK government "actively avoided" looking into possible Russian interference in the Brexit vote 1 4.
Boris Johnson's government attempted to suppress the ISC report for nine months 1.
The report compares the UK's inaction unfavorably to the US response to election meddling 5.
Multiple Conservative administrations, from David Cameron to Boris Johnson, failed to adequately address the threat of Russian interference 4 5.
This systemic failure to investigate and address Russian influence raises significant national security concerns 1 5. The report suggests that Russian influence in UK politics has become "the new normal," with the UK clearly being a target for Russian disinformation 5.
The government's reluctance to investigate could be seen as an attempt to cover up potential connections between Russian influence and Brexit supporters 1. This lack of action across multiple administrations points to a broader, systemic failure in addressing a critical national security issue’ 4 5.
Source:https://www.perplexity.ai/search/1-explain-how-and-why-it-can-b-P8W.BdYnTH.KjYHLXz3VOA#2
‘The suppression of the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) report on Russian interference has negatively impacted the UK's international reputation in several ways:
It raised questions about the UK government's commitment to transparency and democratic processes. The report was delayed for nine months, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson attempting to block its release until after the December 2019 general election 2 4.
The UK's response to potential Russian interference was unfavorably compared to that of the United States. The ISC report noted that while the US produced an intelligence community assessment within two months of the 2016 presidential election, the UK government did not conduct any post-referendum assessment of potential Russian interference in the Brexit vote 5 6.
The delay in publishing the report and the government's apparent reluctance to investigate Russian interference has been seen as a failure to address a significant national security concern. This has led to perceptions that the UK is vulnerable to foreign influence and is not taking the threat seriously enough 1 4.
The report's findings, once released, revealed that the UK government had "actively avoided" looking into possible Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum. This has been viewed as a deliberate attempt to ignore a potential threat to the UK's democratic processes 4 5.
The suppression of the report has been seen as part of a broader pattern of the UK government being "in denial" about Russian influence, potentially due to concerns about questioning the legitimacy of both the Conservative government and its Brexit agenda 5.
The delay in releasing the report and reconvening the Intelligence and Security Committee was described as the longest gap since the committee's creation in 1994, raising concerns about the government's commitment to proper parliamentary oversight of intelligence matters 7.
These factors have collectively contributed to damaging the UK's reputation as a leader in democratic governance and its ability to effectively address threats to national security.’
Source: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/1-explain-how-and-why-it-can-b-P8W.BdYnTH.KjYHLXz3VOA#3
‘The delay in publishing the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) report has had several negative impacts on UK-Russia relations:
Increased suspicion and tension: The prolonged delay in releasing the report, which took over 9 months, raised suspicions about the UK government's motives and increased tensions with Russia 1 7.
Damaged UK's international reputation: The suppression of the report was seen as a failure to address a significant national security concern, damaging the UK's reputation as a leader in democratic governance 4.
Weakened UK's response to Russian threats: The delay prevented timely action on the report's recommendations, potentially leaving the UK more vulnerable to Russian interference 2 5.
Strained diplomatic relations: The report's findings of Russian interference in UK politics, once released, likely strained diplomatic ties between the two countries 6.
Reduced public trust: The delay and subsequent controversy surrounding the report's release may have eroded public trust in the UK government's handling of national security matters related to Russia 3 8.
Hindered intelligence cooperation: The controversy potentially complicated intelligence sharing and cooperation between the UK and its allies regarding Russian activities 5.
The delay in publishing the ISC report has ultimately undermined the UK's ability to effectively address and respond to Russian influence, potentially emboldening further interference attempts 1 8.
Source: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/1-explain-how-and-why-it-can-b-P8W.BdYnTH.KjYHLXz3VOA#4
DeepAI:
‘A thorough investigation into Russian interference in British politics is essential for multiple reasons related to national security. The claims and concerns regarding such interference are rooted in both historical events and ongoing geopolitical tensions. Below is a reliable and valid explanation of how UK national security has been breached and the justification for an in-depth investigation.
1. The Nature of the Threat
Evidence of Interference*:
Numerous reports, including those from intelligence agencies, have indicated that Russia has engaged in a range of activities aimed at influencing UK politics. This includes disinformation campaigns on social media, cyber-attacks, and financial maneuvers that are aligned with Kremlin interests. For instance, the UK Intelligence and Security Committee highlighted concerns about Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum, suggesting that Russian entities attempted to manipulate public perception and undermined trust in democratic processes.
2. Impact on Democratic Integrity
Erosion of Trust:
Russian tactics, particularly through disinformation and propaganda, aim to sow discord and confusion within democratic institutions. This is particularly evident in the aftermath of the Brexit vote, where claims emerged of external manipulation leading to a divided electorate. Such divisions, exacerbated by misinformation, can weaken the overall trust in democratic processes and institutions, thereby undermining national security.
3. Uninvestigated Links to Russian Influence
Inaction on Investigations:
Successive UK governments have faced criticism for not adequately investigating or addressing the potential impact of Russian interference. The lack of thorough and transparent inquiry leads to suspicions about complicity or negligence in safeguarding national interests. For instance, the delay in publishing the Intelligence and Security Committee's report on Russian interference raised questions about government transparency and accountability.
4. Consequences for National Policy and Security
Policy Manipulation:
A failure to address Russian influences can lead to skewed policy decisions that do not necessarily reflect the interests of the UK population. For example, the relationships that certain political figures have maintained with Russian oligarchs can create ethical conflicts that may compromise national security. Can policies be fully trusted if there's a possibility that foreign interests are influencing decision-making?
5. The Importance of a Comprehensive Investigation
Establishing Accountability:
A thorough investigation is critical not only for understanding the extent of Russian interference but also for holding parties accountable. Clear findings can lead to reforms in how political financing and intelligence oversight are handled, ensuring that foreign influence is mitigated in the future.
Restoring Public Confidence:
An in-depth and transparent investigation into Russian interference can serve to restore public trust in democratic processes and institutions. It can reaffirm the commitment to safeguard the UK against foreign threats and re-establish the integrity of the political system.
Conclusion
In light of the potential threats posed by Russian interference in British politics, a long-overdue and thorough investigation is essential for addressing commitments to national security and restoring public confidence in democratic institutions. By examining the scope and methods of interference, the UK can take meaningful steps to secure its political landscape against future threats and reinforce the importance of transparency in governance. This proactive approach is imperative not only for current political stability but also for long-term national security.’
Source: https://deepai.org/chat
ChatGPT4o:
‘UK National Security Breached: The Case for Investigating Russian Interference
Context:
The integrity of the United Kingdom's national security has faced scrutiny due to growing evidence and allegations of Russian interference in British politics. This interference, encompassing cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and potential financial influence, poses a threat to the UK's democratic processes and societal stability. Despite numerous warnings and reports, a comprehensive investigation into these activities has yet to be undertaken.
Key Areas of Concern:
Cyber Threats:
Russian-linked cyber actors have targeted British institutions, political parties, and critical infrastructure. High-profile incidents include attempted hacking of sensitive documents, such as the leak of classified UK-US trade discussions before the 2019 general election. These attacks aim to disrupt and manipulate political discourse, often undermining trust in the democratic process.
Disinformation Campaigns:
Russia’s use of social media platforms and online forums to spread misinformation is well-documented. Such campaigns have sought to polarize debates around significant political events, including the Brexit referendum, by amplifying divisive narratives and fueling public distrust in institutions.
Political Funding Concerns:
Questions have been raised about the origins of donations to political parties and campaigns. Several reports suggest that individuals with ties to the Kremlin may have funneled money into the UK political system, raising concerns about undue influence on policy decisions.
The Intelligence and Security Committee’s (ISC) Report:
The 2020 ISC "Russia Report" highlighted the UK's vulnerabilities to Russian interference. It criticized the government for failing to actively investigate interference in events like the Brexit referendum and for overlooking the threat of foreign influence in political systems. The report called for greater oversight and action to address these risks.
The Need for a Thorough Investigation:
Democratic Integrity:
Without a transparent investigation, public trust in elections and governance erodes. A thorough inquiry can identify vulnerabilities and reinforce the principles of democracy.
National Security:
Russian interference challenges the UK's sovereignty and stability. Understanding the scope of these activities is crucial to counter hybrid threats effectively.
Accountability and Deterrence:
Investigations hold perpetrators accountable and signal that such actions will not be tolerated. They also deter future interference by exposing networks and methods used in these operations.
International Standing:
The UK’s reputation as a defender of democratic values hinges on its ability to address internal and external threats decisively.
Establishing Accountability:
A thorough investigation is critical not only for understanding the extent of Russian interference but also for holding parties accountable. Clear findings can lead to reforms in how political financing and intelligence oversight are handled, ensuring that foreign influence is mitigated in the future.
Restoring Public Confidence:
An in-depth and transparent investigation into Russian interference can serve to restore public trust in democratic processes and institutions. It can reaffirm the commitment to safeguard the UK against foreign threats and re-establish the integrity of the political system.
Conclusion
In light of the potential threats posed by Russian interference in British politics, a long-overdue and thorough investigation is essential for addressing commitments to national security and restoring public confidence in democratic institutions. By examining the scope and methods of interference, the UK can take meaningful steps to secure its political landscape against future threats and reinforce the importance of transparency in governance. This proactive approach is imperative not only for current political stability but also for long-term national security.’
Source: https://deepai.org/chat
ChatGPT4o:
‘UK National Security Breached: The Case for Investigating Russian Interference
Context:
The integrity of the United Kingdom's national security has faced scrutiny due to growing evidence and allegations of Russian interference in British politics. This interference, encompassing cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and potential financial influence, poses a threat to the UK's democratic processes and societal stability. Despite numerous warnings and reports, a comprehensive investigation into these activities has yet to be undertaken.
Key Areas of Concern:
Cyber Threats:
Russian-linked cyber actors have targeted British institutions, political parties, and critical infrastructure. High-profile incidents include attempted hacking of sensitive documents, such as the leak of classified UK-US trade discussions before the 2019 general election. These attacks aim to disrupt and manipulate political discourse, often undermining trust in the democratic process.
Disinformation Campaigns:
Russia’s use of social media platforms and online forums to spread misinformation is well-documented. Such campaigns have sought to polarize debates around significant political events, including the Brexit referendum, by amplifying divisive narratives and fueling public distrust in institutions.
Political Funding Concerns:
Questions have been raised about the origins of donations to political parties and campaigns. Several reports suggest that individuals with ties to the Kremlin may have funneled money into the UK political system, raising concerns about undue influence on policy decisions.
The Intelligence and Security Committee’s (ISC) Report:
The 2020 ISC "Russia Report" highlighted the UK's vulnerabilities to Russian interference. It criticized the government for failing to actively investigate interference in events like the Brexit referendum and for overlooking the threat of foreign influence in political systems. The report called for greater oversight and action to address these risks.
The Need for a Thorough Investigation:
Democratic Integrity:
Without a transparent investigation, public trust in elections and governance erodes. A thorough inquiry can identify vulnerabilities and reinforce the principles of democracy.
National Security:
Russian interference challenges the UK's sovereignty and stability. Understanding the scope of these activities is crucial to counter hybrid threats effectively.
Accountability and Deterrence:
Investigations hold perpetrators accountable and signal that such actions will not be tolerated. They also deter future interference by exposing networks and methods used in these operations.
International Standing:
The UK’s reputation as a defender of democratic values hinges on its ability to address internal and external threats decisively.
Conclusion:
A comprehensive, overdue investigation into Russian interference is essential to safeguard the UK's democratic integrity and national security. By addressing this issue transparently and decisively, the UK can fortify its institutions against future threats, restore public confidence, and uphold its democratic principles. Failure to act risks further erosion of trust and national vulnerability.
Source: https://chatgpt.com/c/67488588-9e6c-8003-8500-8bfa0d33dbd4
NOTES
Perplexity: ‘Exercising critical thinking, independently verifying the validity and reliability of data, and fact-checking information from generally reliable sources are crucial for users of AI language software for several reasons:
Hallucinations and Inaccuracies: AI language models, even advanced ones, can generate responses that are not grounded in reality, a phenomenon known as "hallucinations." These models can confidently provide incorrect or misleading information, which can be particularly problematic if users rely solely on the model's responses [1][2][4].
Limited Training Data: AI models are trained on specific datasets, and their accuracy is limited by the quality and scope of these datasets. For example, Google's DataGemma tool, while effective, has limitations in terms of the data it can access and the questions it can answer accurately. If the relevant data is not in the model's training set or database, the model may not provide accurate or reliable information [1].
Real-Time Information Challenges: AI models often struggle with real-time events or breaking news, as their training data may not include the latest developments. This can lead to incorrect or outdated information being provided, as seen in the case of Meta AI's responses to the attempted assassination of former President Trump [4].
Subjective Framing and Nuance: Fact-checking is not always straightforward, as AI models may not capture the nuances of human communication. A quote or statement might be technically accurate but misleading due to the context or framing. Human judgement is often necessary to understand the full implications and context of the information provided [5].
Error and Unknown Rates: Studies have shown that even the most accurate AI fact-checking models have error rates. For instance, Originality.ai, which has a high accuracy rate of 72.3%, still has a small error rate and may return "unknown" results for certain queries. This underscores the need for users to verify information independently [2][3].
Manipulated Media and Information Warfare: Bad actors can engineer ways to circumvent AI fact-checking tools, spreading misinformation or manipulated media that might evade detection. This means that relying solely on AI for fact-checking can leave users vulnerable to misinformation [5].
Impact on Decision-Making: For important decisions or critical information, relying solely on AI model responses can be risky. Incorrect or misleading information can have significant consequences, whether in personal, professional, or public contexts. Independent verification from reliable sources ensures that decisions are based on accurate and trustworthy information.
In summary, exercising critical thinking and independently verifying the validity and reliability of data from generally reliable sources are essential because AI language models can generate inaccurate information, have limitations in their training data, struggle with real-time events, lack nuance in their responses, and are not immune to errors or manipulation. These factors highlight the importance of a multi-layered approach to fact-checking to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information used for important decisions.
Citations:
[1] https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/09/12/1103926/googles-new-tool-lets-large-language-models-fact-check-their-responses/
[2] https://originality.ai/blog/ai-fact-checking-accuracy
[3] https://originality.ai/automated-fact-checker
[4] https://about.fb.com/news/2024/07/review-of-fact-checking-label-and-meta-ai-responses/
[5] https://www.niemanlab.org/2022/12/ai-will-start-fact-checking-we-may-not-like-the-results/
[6] https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/Steps-in-fact-checking-AI-generated-content
[7] https://libguides.uel.ac.uk/artificial-intelligence/using-ai-critically
[8] https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/how-generative-ai-chatbots-responded-questions-and-fact-checks-about-2024-uk-general-election
Source: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/explain-why-it-is-important-fo-wLezjtPtReucQFNpfsd9ZA,OpenSourceAI,Perplexity 21 October 2024
DeepAI: ‘The text emphasises the importance of critical thinking and independent verification when using AI language models. Key points include:
1. Inaccuracy: AI may produce plausible but inaccurate information, which can be outdated or false.
2. Contextual Understanding: AI lacks human-like comprehension, leading to incomplete or skewed responses.
3. Bias: AI training data may include biases, which can influence the outputs and reinforce stereotypes.
4. Source Variability: AI responses can stem from both reputable and unreliable sources, necessitating careful evaluation of credibility.
5. Static Information: AI cannot provide real-time updates, making it essential to consult current, trustworthy sources for changing topics.
6. Complexity: Many subjects require deep understanding that AI responses might not adequately cover.
7. Consequences of Misinformation: Relying solely on AI for critical decisions can lead to severe consequences due to potential misinformation.
8. Promoting Critical Thinking: Engaging critically with information leads to better decision-making and understanding.
In conclusion, while AI can be a useful resource, users should approach its outputs cautiously and verify information to make informed, responsible decisions.’ https://deepai.org/chat DeepAI 21 October 2024
ChatGPT4o: ‘It is essential for users of AI language software to exercise critical thinking and independently verify the validity and reliability of information for several key reasons:
1. Potential for Errors: AI models, while highly advanced, are not infallible. They can generate incorrect, outdated, or misleading information because they rely on vast datasets that may include inaccuracies or biases. Although these models can analyse data efficiently, they don't inherently understand the truthfulness of that data.
2. Bias in Data: The data that AI models are trained on can contain inherent biases that reflect the information they were fed. This may result in responses that perpetuate stereotypes, skewed perspectives, or factual inaccuracies. Critical thinking allows users to identify and account for these biases.
3. Dynamic Nature of Information: The real world is constantly changing, and information - especially in areas like science, politics, or technology - may quickly become outdated. AI models, unless specifically updated or browsing current information, may provide responses that do not reflect the most up-to-date facts. Independent verification ensures that the information is current and reliable.
4. Limitations in Context Understanding: AI can sometimes misunderstand the full context of a user's question or lack nuanced interpretation. While it can produce highly accurate responses in many cases, it might miss subtle details or the broader implications of a question, which a human reviewer or expert could more easily identify.
5. Ethical and Responsible Use: Relying solely on AI-generated content for critical decisions (e.g., medical advice, financial planning, or legal matters) without verification can be risky. AI tools should be seen as aids to decision-making rather than the final authority. Fact-checking ensures that important decisions are based on robust, well-rounded information from multiple reliable sources.
6. Avoiding Misinterpretation: AI models, including language models, generate responses based on probability, not understanding. This means that they can sometimes output responses that seem plausible but are incorrect or misinterpreted. Users need to cross-check information from reputable sources to avoid potential harm.
In summary, critical thinking and independent fact-checking help ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. By verifying the reliability and validity of AI-generated content, users can avoid errors, mitigate bias, and make better-informed decisions.’
Source: https://chatgpt.com/c/67164309-62c4-8003-9c1b-58fdbb98ecad ChatGPT4o 21 October 2024
A comprehensive, overdue investigation into Russian interference is essential to safeguard the UK's democratic integrity and national security. By addressing this issue transparently and decisively, the UK can fortify its institutions against future threats, restore public confidence, and uphold its democratic principles. Failure to act risks further erosion of trust and national vulnerability.
Source: https://chatgpt.com/c/67488588-9e6c-8003-8500-8bfa0d33dbd4
NOTES
Perplexity: ‘Exercising critical thinking, independently verifying the validity and reliability of data, and fact-checking information from generally reliable sources are crucial for users of AI language software for several reasons:
Hallucinations and Inaccuracies: AI language models, even advanced ones, can generate responses that are not grounded in reality, a phenomenon known as "hallucinations." These models can confidently provide incorrect or misleading information, which can be particularly problematic if users rely solely on the model's responses [1][2][4].
Limited Training Data: AI models are trained on specific datasets, and their accuracy is limited by the quality and scope of these datasets. For example, Google's DataGemma tool, while effective, has limitations in terms of the data it can access and the questions it can answer accurately. If the relevant data is not in the model's training set or database, the model may not provide accurate or reliable information [1].
Real-Time Information Challenges: AI models often struggle with real-time events or breaking news, as their training data may not include the latest developments. This can lead to incorrect or outdated information being provided, as seen in the case of Meta AI's responses to the attempted assassination of former President Trump [4].
Subjective Framing and Nuance: Fact-checking is not always straightforward, as AI models may not capture the nuances of human communication. A quote or statement might be technically accurate but misleading due to the context or framing. Human judgement is often necessary to understand the full implications and context of the information provided [5].
Error and Unknown Rates: Studies have shown that even the most accurate AI fact-checking models have error rates. For instance, Originality.ai, which has a high accuracy rate of 72.3%, still has a small error rate and may return "unknown" results for certain queries. This underscores the need for users to verify information independently [2][3].
Manipulated Media and Information Warfare: Bad actors can engineer ways to circumvent AI fact-checking tools, spreading misinformation or manipulated media that might evade detection. This means that relying solely on AI for fact-checking can leave users vulnerable to misinformation [5].
Impact on Decision-Making: For important decisions or critical information, relying solely on AI model responses can be risky. Incorrect or misleading information can have significant consequences, whether in personal, professional, or public contexts. Independent verification from reliable sources ensures that decisions are based on accurate and trustworthy information.
In summary, exercising critical thinking and independently verifying the validity and reliability of data from generally reliable sources are essential because AI language models can generate inaccurate information, have limitations in their training data, struggle with real-time events, lack nuance in their responses, and are not immune to errors or manipulation. These factors highlight the importance of a multi-layered approach to fact-checking to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information used for important decisions.
Citations:
[1] https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/09/12/1103926/googles-new-tool-lets-large-language-models-fact-check-their-responses/
[2] https://originality.ai/blog/ai-fact-checking-accuracy
[3] https://originality.ai/automated-fact-checker
[4] https://about.fb.com/news/2024/07/review-of-fact-checking-label-and-meta-ai-responses/
[5] https://www.niemanlab.org/2022/12/ai-will-start-fact-checking-we-may-not-like-the-results/
[6] https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/Steps-in-fact-checking-AI-generated-content
[7] https://libguides.uel.ac.uk/artificial-intelligence/using-ai-critically
[8] https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/how-generative-ai-chatbots-responded-questions-and-fact-checks-about-2024-uk-general-election
Source: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/explain-why-it-is-important-fo-wLezjtPtReucQFNpfsd9ZA,OpenSourceAI,Perplexity 21 October 2024
DeepAI: ‘The text emphasises the importance of critical thinking and independent verification when using AI language models. Key points include:
1. Inaccuracy: AI may produce plausible but inaccurate information, which can be outdated or false.
2. Contextual Understanding: AI lacks human-like comprehension, leading to incomplete or skewed responses.
3. Bias: AI training data may include biases, which can influence the outputs and reinforce stereotypes.
4. Source Variability: AI responses can stem from both reputable and unreliable sources, necessitating careful evaluation of credibility.
5. Static Information: AI cannot provide real-time updates, making it essential to consult current, trustworthy sources for changing topics.
6. Complexity: Many subjects require deep understanding that AI responses might not adequately cover.
7. Consequences of Misinformation: Relying solely on AI for critical decisions can lead to severe consequences due to potential misinformation.
8. Promoting Critical Thinking: Engaging critically with information leads to better decision-making and understanding.
In conclusion, while AI can be a useful resource, users should approach its outputs cautiously and verify information to make informed, responsible decisions.’ https://deepai.org/chat DeepAI 21 October 2024
ChatGPT4o: ‘It is essential for users of AI language software to exercise critical thinking and independently verify the validity and reliability of information for several key reasons:
1. Potential for Errors: AI models, while highly advanced, are not infallible. They can generate incorrect, outdated, or misleading information because they rely on vast datasets that may include inaccuracies or biases. Although these models can analyse data efficiently, they don't inherently understand the truthfulness of that data.
2. Bias in Data: The data that AI models are trained on can contain inherent biases that reflect the information they were fed. This may result in responses that perpetuate stereotypes, skewed perspectives, or factual inaccuracies. Critical thinking allows users to identify and account for these biases.
3. Dynamic Nature of Information: The real world is constantly changing, and information - especially in areas like science, politics, or technology - may quickly become outdated. AI models, unless specifically updated or browsing current information, may provide responses that do not reflect the most up-to-date facts. Independent verification ensures that the information is current and reliable.
4. Limitations in Context Understanding: AI can sometimes misunderstand the full context of a user's question or lack nuanced interpretation. While it can produce highly accurate responses in many cases, it might miss subtle details or the broader implications of a question, which a human reviewer or expert could more easily identify.
5. Ethical and Responsible Use: Relying solely on AI-generated content for critical decisions (e.g., medical advice, financial planning, or legal matters) without verification can be risky. AI tools should be seen as aids to decision-making rather than the final authority. Fact-checking ensures that important decisions are based on robust, well-rounded information from multiple reliable sources.
6. Avoiding Misinterpretation: AI models, including language models, generate responses based on probability, not understanding. This means that they can sometimes output responses that seem plausible but are incorrect or misinterpreted. Users need to cross-check information from reputable sources to avoid potential harm.
In summary, critical thinking and independent fact-checking help ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. By verifying the reliability and validity of AI-generated content, users can avoid errors, mitigate bias, and make better-informed decisions.’
Source: https://chatgpt.com/c/67164309-62c4-8003-9c1b-58fdbb98ecad ChatGPT4o 21 October 2024
LINKS
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTQhbFN2rwcqdQ854viYUkNQCYHUjX8XjYGsSVkoAYk9nkBdALO-IoMZQoKWXA-14i0X_dQ622EX2gN/pub CLASSIFIED need to know happy times are Party times - nothing to see here! #PoliticalSatire #DeepAIgeneratedImage #RussianInterference #UKpolitics #EUpolitics #BrexitVoters2016 UK NATIONAL SECURITY BREACHED A long-overdue, thorough investigation of Russian Interference in British politics is essential for national security, political trust and social stability. #Accountability #OpenSourceAI #Perplexity #DeepAI #ChatGPT4o Llewelyn Pritchard 28 November 2024
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/spooking-spooks-media-complicity-security-concerns-pritchard-ma-k5gxf/ https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRn0IbqqQ3e2y0kDe_Q-KrUG2FNYbMF8v91uDkTR7ShVilRi0HXIEpmv1xHG-_rOUlawPEgxgbN51n2/pub Spooking the Spooks: Media Complicity and Security Concerns over Lebedev and Johnson. Otto English looks at the relationship between the son of a KGB spy and the Prime Minister and how it raises troubling questions about the closeness between media owners and politicians. 25 October 2019
https://lnkd.in/ef39ZmuF https://lnkd.in/eBtFmZ4V https://lnkd.in/eet3q3ek Show this thread @carolecadwalla Carole Cadwalla LANDMARK RULING IN STRASBOURG AS MPs CHALLENGE UK TORY GOVERNMENT OVER FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN BREXIT
EXTRACTS ‘Nothing less than the future of democracy is at stake’ says @CarolineLucas as a cross-party coalition and The Citizens win an unprecedented hearing. Since Russian President Vladimir Putin launched his all-out war on Ukraine almost a year ago, the Kremlin’s long-term plans for imperial expansion have come under closer scrutiny, particularly its use of ‘alternative measures’ to undermine the EU through propaganda and the funding of right-wing Eurosceptic parties in France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands. But what about the UK?
Though dismissed or ignored at the time, Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee’s 2018 report on disinformation and fake news outlined the impact of the Russian Embassy in London, and state-backed media outlets RT and Sputnik, in supporting the Leave campaigns.
It also revealed the role social media operations such as the Internet Research Agency and the now defunct Cambridge Analytica had in promoting Brexit. A year later, in 2019, Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee concluded in its ‘Russia Report’ that Kremlin interference in elections was the “new normal” and there were “credible attempts” to meddle with the UK’s democratic processes.
For whatever reason, Boris Johnson succeeded in delaying the publication of the Russia Report in the run-up to the 2019 General Election. When – against Johnson’s wishes – it was finally published in July 2020, the report also contained the staggering admission that there had been no official investigation into the potential damage done to our democracy by what was, by then, clearly a hostile foreign power.
Johnson’s apathy over our democratic national security was not new. While Foreign Secretary in 2017, Johnson claimed there was “not a sausage” of evidence of Putin meddling in Brexit, despite his nominal role overseeing GCHQ at the time, which had been working with the FBI’s Special Counsel Robert Mueller on precisely that. Mueller had named Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud as a Russian agent in London. As the Observer and Byline reported, Mifsud met Johnson to talk about Brexit.'
'Evgeny Lebedev was controversially elevated to the House of Lords by Johnson in 2020 – as Baron of Hampton in Richmond upon Thames and Siberia in the Russian Federation. His father, Alexander, a former senior KGB officer, is alleged to have been present when, as Foreign Secretary, Johnson left his security detail behind to travel to the Lebedev’s Umbrian villa following a NATO briefing on the attempted murder of defector Sergei Skripal by Russian military intelligence using the Novichok nerve agent in Salisbury. Johnson denies any official matters were discussed, but Paul Caruana Galizia has reported for Tortoise that Johnson was offered a back-channel to the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sergei Lavrov.
'With all this evidence of the Kremlin’s close interest in British affairs, not least of all Putin’s public intervention insisting that Theresa May get on with Brexit, Johnson eventually changed his tune by 2022, telling the House of Commons: “I have seen absolutely no evidence of successful Russian interference in any electoral event”.
Given Johnson’s record of equivocal and often mendacious statements, combined with the admission from the intelligence services explicitly that they had never been tasked to investigate these matters, we cannot afford to rely on the former Prime Minister’s word.
In response to this glaring and potentially compromising lack of electoral and national security, a group of parliamentarians took the UK Government to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) last March, with the support of campaigning journalism organisation The Citizens. The cross-party group of MPs – including Green Party MP Caroline Lucas, Labour’s Ben Bradshaw and the SNP’s Alyn Smith – claim the Government is infringing our “right to free and fair elections” by failing to act on the findings of the Russia Report.
h
The court in Strasbourg has now indicated the case both has merit and may be designated an ‘impact case’. It has written to the Government inviting it to respond in detail to the allegations by 26 April.'
'“Following the 2016 EU referendum, but long before the ISC Russia Report, there was a considerable and growing body of evidence that Russia was interested in and acting to disturb Western election processes,” Ricketts continued. “It is a matter of public record that both the U.S. election in 2016 and the French election in 2017 were subject to Russian interference…. Given the evidence that has now amassed of Russian interference, it is important to establish once and for all whether Russia attempted to interfere in the EU Referendum and subsequent UK general elections.” '
Peter Jukes @peterjukes 19 January 2023 https://lnkd.in/ei89vnyn Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights @HoCPrivileges @covidinquiryuk @CovidJusticeUK @cymru_inquiry @carolecadwalla
https://lnkd.in/eb3tjwwE BORIS JOHNSON CANNOT BE TRUSTED - in battle for political future amid fresh evidence he misled MPs. Privileges committee document intended to help ex-PM prepare for questioning contains wealth of new information.
Boris Johnson faces a battle for his future in parliament after a cross-party committee found there was significant evidence he misled MPs over lockdown parties, and that he and aides almost certainly knew at the time they were breaking rules.
The damning report includes one witness saying the then prime minister told a packed No 10 gathering in November 2020, when strict Covid restrictions were in force, that “this is probably the most unsocially distanced gathering in the UK right now”.
Other new evidence includes a message from a No 10 official in April 2021, six months before the first reports of parties emerged, saying a colleague was “worried about leaks of PM having a piss-up – and to be fair I don’t think it’s unwarranted”.
The details came in a report from the Commons privileges committee, a seven-strong group of MPs, four of them Conservatives, which has been tasked with discovering whether Johnson misled parliament in denying any wrongdoing, and then if this was deliberate. Read more Peter Walker, Rowena Mason 3 March 2023 MY INSERT
https://lnkd.in/eKvgNxjy BORIS JOHNSON 'NATIONALLY DISTRUSTED', CABINET SECRETARY TOLD MATT HANCOCK Top civil servant's warning revealed in latest WhatsApp leak.
Boris Johnson was a “nationally distrusted figure” as prime minister, the country’s top civil servant said, according to the latest leaks of Matt Hancock’s WhatsApp messages.
The comments from October 2020 were published by The Daily Telegraph, as part of the latest tranche of leaked correspondence from the former health secretary.
Simon Case, the cabinet secretary, made the remark to Hancock as the pair discussed Covid testing capability. Ned Simons 5 March 2023
https://lnkd.in/eMv2rX8j https://lnkd.in/erHmeXcn Explain how and why the Conservative majority UK Parliament at Westminster, London and beyond is no longer fit for purpose. #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 27 April 2023
https://lnkd.in/eVWy5fHd Explain Constitutional Corrosion UK #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 25 March 2023
https://lnkd.in/ezQj8nt9 https://lnkd.in/e3Pqfs96 Explain how and why 13 years of Conservative government has degraded the political, social and economic fabric of the UK #AI #OpenSource #GPTChat Llewelyn Pritchard MA 2 May 2023 #Degradation #People #Society #Britain #PublicSectorCuts #Conservatives #ThePoorGetPoorer #TheRichGetRicher #IncompetentToryGovernment #CameronLies #MayHidesHerLies #JohnsonLies #TrussLies #SunakLies #PrimeMInistersLie #ChancellorsLie #ToriesLie #PeopleDie #UnfitForPariament #VoteLabour
https://lnkd.in/eeqYNPfa https://lnkd.in/e2tvYJ9j Evidence: Rishi Sunak’s parliamentary majority undermines Democracy UK. "Voter ID is not about tackling electoral fraud. It is about creating yet another barrier to democratic participation" (Jeremy Corbyn the MP for Islington North 21 April 2023) #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 1 May 2023 #ConstitutionalCorrosion #UnderminingDemocracy #UK #VoterSupression #BorisTrumpPlaybook #Elections #ElectionInterference #ElectionResultsInterference #LocalElection #GeneralElectionNOW #ToryCorruption #IncompetentToryGovernment #VoteLabour
https://lnkd.in/d-Qe_c8w https://lnkd.in/dc52uW_j EXTRACT "There is evidence that the House of Commons may have been misled in the following ways which the Committee will explore: ... Summary of issues to be raised with Mr Johnson. This is a House of Commons Committee report. Fourth Report of Session 2022–23 Matter referred on 21 April 2022 Author: Committee of Privileges inc, Footnotes 21 March 2023 my images https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/ https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/ https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/ https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/ amplification
Explain The House Of Commons Privileges Committee #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 18 March 2023
Explain the integrity of the House Of Commons Privileges Committee #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 18 March 2023
Harriet Harman @HarrietHarman and Sir Bernard Jenkin @bernardjenkin publish joint article in The Times rebutting press criticism. 16 August 2022
Boris Johnson r. at a leaving gathering in the vestibule of the press office of 10 Downing Street in November 2020. Photograph Cabinet Office PA Boris Johnson makes a last-ditch bid to discredit Partygate inquiry. Ex-prime minister due at televised Commons committee hearing, with legal team about to publish new evidence backing his claims. Michael Savage and Toby Helm 18 March 2023 NOTE Parliament TV on Wednesday 22 March, from 14:00
Explain why and in what sort of circumstances an ex-Prime Minister of the UK, whose behaviour is being investigated by the House Of Commons Privileges Committee @HoCPrivileges, should decide to undermine the integrity of that Committee by the actions of his followers. #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 19 March 2023
https://lnkd.in/eF3jJgcR Explain when an untrustworthy member of the Conservative party is appointed to the post of prime minister it is evidence of a general, corrupt pathocracy that is unfit to govern. #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 19 March 2023 #JohnsonLies #PeopleDie #UnfitForParliament
https://lnkd.in/e2gKeZbe "The problem of pathocracy" Do psychologists have a responsibility to help prevent ruthless, amoral people attaining positions of power? #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT 22 February 2023
https://lnkd.in/eTPseQfE The darkness of Boris Johnson: a psychologist on the prime minister’s unpalatable personality traits Dr. Steve Taylor, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, Leeds Beckett University 16 May 2022
https://lnkd.in/eC2pBwfm Explain in what binding or non-binding circumstance can a serving Conservative Prime Minister of the UK obtain a legal judgement in his favour … when the overwhelming burden of proof shows that, for example, by deliberately attending an illegal so-called ‘lockdown party’, by stating that it was the ‘most socially distanced party in the UK’ and as PM not showing due regard nor respect for the ‘lockdown sacrifices’ made by others how he must have known in advance that he would not be following and/or not be legally bound to follow his own Tory government’s parliamentary legislation. How, of his own volition, selfishly, unlawfully, willfully, deliberately, irresponsibly he must have known in advance of his attendance at the said party or parties that he could be found guilty of either intentionally, or unintentionally, misleading other Members of Parliament in the House of Commons. #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 15 March 2023
https://lnkd.in/e8yuXJ2Y How can a former prime minister of the UK legally justify his claim that he did not mislead Parliament by claiming he 'didn't know' he was breaking any law by his confirmed attendance at more than one legally forbidden so-called 'Lockdown Parties' where, at one party, he joked about being at ‘UK’s most unsocially distanced party’ during lockdown? The former prime minister made the remarks to No 10 staff at a alcohol-fuelled leaving do claiming the rules and guidance he was responsible for implementing as Prime Minister were followed at all times. #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 15 March 2023
https://lnkd.in/eNsq6New Explain what “Misleading Parliament” as interpreted by the House of Commons Privileges Committee, consisting of a Conservative majority of committee members means in the UK. #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 9 March 2023
https://lnkd.in/eXM4Ajkv i) What does “In Contempt of Parliament” and ii) What does any Conservative MP being “In Contempt of Parliament”as interpreted by the House of Commons Privileges Committee, consisting of a Conservative majority of committee members mean in the UK? #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 9 March 2023
https://lnkd.in/e7bQpr5v https://lnkd.in/ea2BYWdN JOHNSON'S CONTEMPT COULD BE HIS UNDOING: Boris Johnson has dug his own political grave with his and his cronies unforgivable attack on Parliament. However, an even worse threat to Johnson comes as a result of his own unethical, criminal behaviour when Foreign Secretary regarding Russian interference in our EU referendum and from his evil efforts to achieve a ‘Constitutional Corrosion’ of Parliamentary Standards taken straight out of the Donald Trump playbook. Acknowledgement Ian Dunt @IanDunt 24 March 2023
https://lnkd.in/efz9Zt52 "Tory Sleaze" in Context of Boris Johnson's Government Explained with Evidence #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 9 March 2023 @HoCPrivileges
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED How Westminster Works … and Why It Doesn’t is published by Orion (£18.99). To support the Guardian and Observer order your copy at https://guardianbookshop.com/how-westminster-works-.-.-.-and-why-it-doesnt-9781399602730?utm_source=editoriallink&utm_medium=merch&utm_campaign=article https://www.guardianbookshop.com A biting critique of Westminster that shines a light on how British politics really operates Delivery charges may apply. Ian Dunt @IanDunt 13 April 2023
"British politics is broken.
Anyone sitting down to watch the news will get the sense that something has gone terribly wrong. We have prime ministers who detonate the economy, secretaries of state who are intellectually incapable of doing the job and MPs who seem temperamentally unsuited to the role. Expertise is denigrated. Lies are rewarded. And deep-seated, long-lasting national problems go permanently unresolved. Most of us have a sense that the system doesn't work, but we struggle to articulate exactly why. Our political and financial system is cloaked in secrecy, archaic terminology, ancient custom and impenetrable technical jargon.
Lifting the lid on British politics, How Westminster Works . . . and Why It Doesn't exposes every aspect of the system in a way that can be understood and challenged, from the heights of Downing Street to the depths of the nation's newsrooms, from the hallways of the civil service to the green benches of the Commons.
Based on interviews with some of the leading voices in politics, from former occupants of No.10 to key figures in Whitehall, Westminster and Fleet Street, Ian Dunt provides exactly what people in power have always tried to avoid: a full description of the mechanisms of British government. And a vision of how we can fix it."
Product Details
Authors: Ian DuntYear Published: 2023 Country of Publication: United KingdomFormat: Hardback ISBN: 9781399602730 Number of Pages: 448 Publication Date: 13/04/2023 Publisher: Orion Publishing CoImprint: Weidenfeld & Nicolson Place of Publication: London SKU: 9781399602730
#work #job #people #power #london #economy #civil #publishing
https://lnkd.in/eyvPcsYM https://lnkd.in/eqVEHCWX Explain how and why Queen Elizabeth II’s, King Charles III and Queen Consort Camilla’s corrupting, colonial, capitalist, Crown Corporations should be abolished in Canada. 6 May 2023 “Crown Coronation day”. #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 30 April 2023
https://lnkd.in/ep5TyzxS https://lnkd.in/ep5TyzxS Explain fighting climate change means fighting corruption. #AI #OpenSource #GPTchat Llewelyn Pritchard MA 9 March 2023
https://lnkd.in/e3pjsqeU https://lnkd.in/eqp97FKB Explain why the Coronation of King Charles III represents both colonial history and on-going ecocide in the form of corrupt colonial, British Crown, capitalist, racial genocide in Canada exemplified by Crown corporations such as Nalcor, acts of impunity, ‘man camps’, Murdered And Missing Indigenous Women and Girls facilitated by UK and Canada’s unjust constitutional and criminal legislation. #AI #OpenSource #GPTChat Llewelyn Pritchard MA 7 May 2023 #CrownCorporations #Corruption #CrownCorporations #Colonialism #Corporations #Capitalism #MMIWG #StopEcocide #StopRacialGenocide #MMIWG #ManCamps #Canada #UK #HumanRights #RightsOfNature #ClimateJustice #RevokeColonialLaw #NoFreePriorInformedConsent #ConsultationIsNotConsent #AbolishCrownCorporations #CivilResistance #CostOfLivingClimateJusticeSolutions
https://lnkd.in/e8r6wWSX https://lnkd.in/e3BktvW2 Explain how ecocide is causing genocide, particularly on-going colonial racial genocide in UKCanada today. #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 9 April 2023
https://lnkd.in/expHbdzD https://lnkd.in/e2Z93PKW a) Evaluate increasing evidence that large hydroelectric dams contribute to atmospheric methane emissions, which are even more potent greenhouse gases than carbon dioxide. b) Evaluate the evidence that large hydroelectric dams cause methyl mercury poisoning of land, water, food and people. c) Explain why it is crucial for life on earth and how realistic it is that ecological destruction, atmospheric methane and other greenhouse gas emissions caused by the unsustainable business development of hydro electric dams is rapidly phased out worldwide by 2030 to keep our whole planet within 1.5 Centigrade degrees average increase of global warming. #AI #OpenSource #GPTChat Llewelyn Pritchard MA 2 May 2023
https://lnkd.in/ewHjPw65 https://lnkd.in/e3jsNZKY Explain why dam removal is of crucial importance in European policy and practice #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 1 May 2023
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/muskrat-falls-inquiry-misguided-project-1.5492169 SCATHING MUSKRAT FALLS INQUIRY REPORT LAYS BLAME ON EXECUTIVES Former Nalcor CEO Ed Martin and others took 'unprincipled steps' to secure project sanction, says report. Terry Roberts CBC News 10 Mar 2020 #History #Dispossession #Canada https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dispossessed-eviction-inuit-from-hebron-labrador-2017-pritchard-ma/ #Dispossessed #ColonialLaw #ForcedAssimilation #LandBack #SelfDetermination #Innu #Sheshatshiu #Inuit #Hebron #NunatuKavut #Colonisation #HudsonsBayCompany #DrWilfredGrenfell #DrHarryPaddon #Health #Settlers #MuskratFalls #HappyValleyGooseBay #NWRiver #MudLake #Rigolet #Mishtashipu #GrandRiverLabrador #Labrador #NewfoundlandAndLabrador #IndigenousPeoples #FreeRivers #RepairNaturesArteries #RestoreRiversNaturalState #RepairBioDiversity #RepairNature #FundNature #RestoreNature #Nalcor #FailedLeadership #JustinTrudeau #DwightBall #SiobhanCoady #JudyFoote #BetrayedVotersTrust #ImmoralLeadership #LiberalCorruption #CEOs #CorruptBusinessLeaders #CorruptPoliticians #Colonialism #Capitalism #NaturalResources #Exploitation #EcologicalDestruction #Methane #MethylMercury #PoisoningLabradorsLandCountryFoodsAndPeople #HydroDamsGenerateMethaneAtmosphericGreenhouseGasEmissions #HydroElectricityIsNotCleanIsNotGreen #GlobalWarming #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis #ClimateChaos #RapidlyCutMethane #StopHydroDamDeforestation #StopDrowningForests #StopKillingTrees #RapidlyPhaseOutALLfossilFuels #DestroyingMaritimeWaysOfLife #NalcorCrownCorporation #CrownCorporation #CorruptColonialCrownCapitalistCorporation
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dispossessed-eviction-inuit-from-hebron-labrador-2017-pritchard-ma/ DISPOSSESSED: THE EVICTION OF INUIT FROM HEBRON, LABRADOR Carol Brice-Bennett 2017 With a foreword by Daniel Chartier [sole responsibility for transcription quality: Llewelyn Pritchard MA] 27 January 2021 #climatecrisis #inuk #resilient #adapt
https://lnkd.in/eT-iE9h7 https://lnkd.in/eT86UWqC Explain Climate Justice is Respecting and Protecting Human Rights as Rights of Nature #AI #OpenSource #GPTChat 6 March 2023
UNITE TO SURVIVE Choose Your Future - It's 2 months until The Big One - Planet Earth’s Call To Action from 21 April 2023 and beyond
https://youtu.be/hJ0sVLsvEcc JOHAN ROCKSTROM EXPLAINS THE CATASTROPHIC RISKS OF PASSING MULTIPLE CLIMATE TIPPING POINTS "Human emissions have already pushed Earth into the danger zone. Multiple climate tipping points could be triggered if global temperature rises beyond 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, according to a major new analysis published in the journal Science. Co-author Johan Rockström explains the study's findings from a ship on the North Atlantic (filmed 25 August 2022 off Norwegian coast)."
'To maintain liveable conditions on Earth, protect people from rising extremes, and enable stable societies, we must do everything possible to prevent crossing dangerous tipping points. Every 10th of a degree counts - @jrockstrom on latest paper in Science': https://lnkd.in/eyH5sep6 Potsdam Institute @PIK_Climate 9 September 2022 To ensure a safe & just future for people, #nature & the planet #Earth System Boundaries must include: #justice! New study results by international team of scientists from the @SafeJustPlanet amongst them PIK Director @jrockstrom
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQeVSEbl25uUd3-kSMj64tj87wY_mpJDjnBXWXnF3slad1qMYArXt2MWwJ1nf--VnPDsMFateajHmY3/pub Explain how in the socio-economic divisive tradition of selection underlying State education in the UK, for example by the introduction of State funded, unethical, immoral, inequitable, tripartite Secondary Education, ‘justified’ by the Spens Report 1938, the introduction of The National Curriculum under the Margaret Thatcher Conservative Party ideological regime has continued a similar degrading effect on the moral development of children and society in general by 2023 and has contributed to a Tory-ruled, oppressed population’s worsening social-economic legal inequalities and opportunities in glaring contrast to private, public school, more financially privileged educational provision. #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 27 March 2023
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTkDxqG005OEgby_Noa5SakxcbEa2538YjJN47GcQ_-uj0yW_LP4yXW8yx2gb4jEzWD1G5WWR-diGxw/pub Explain the Institute of Education's perspective about the National Curriculum #AI #OpenSource #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard MA 27 March 2023
https://guardianbookshop.com/shadow-state-9781783352050 Shadow State - Murder, Mayhem and Russia's Remaking of the West Luke Harding 2021
https://guardianbookshop.com/mafia-state-9781783352517 Mafia State - How One Reporter Became an Enemy of the Brutal New Russia Luke Harding 2021
Tags #Sleaze #Fraud #Crime #Ethics #Morality #Law #Order #Trust #Brexit #EU #Treason #KremxitHorrorShow #Politicians #Corruption #PoliticalCorruption #Conservatives #PoliticalParty #Politics #ImmoralLeadership #AmoralLeadership #Pathocracy #Pathocrats #UK #Government #FailedLeadership #NoShame #NoRemorse #Liars #Justice #Education #Standards #ParliamentaryStandards #Constitution #ConstitutionalCorrosion #CoronationKingCharlesIII #CrownCorporations #DefendDemocracy #LawNational #LawInternational #Democracy #DemocraticInstitutions #DemocraticStandards #PublicOffice #StandardsInPublicOffice #CivilServants #Politicians #PrimeMinister #GamingTheSystem #JohnsonLies #PeopleDie #UnfitForParliament #PublicServants #Truth #Accountability #CorruptParliamentarySystem #CorruptPoliticians #CorruptPrimeMinister #UnderminingDemocracy #ColonialLawUKCA #ColonialStandardsUKCA #CorruptColoniaCrownlCapitalismUKCA #CorruptCrownCorporation #CorruptColonialCrownCorporation #Capitalism #CorruptColonialCrownCapitalistCorporation #MMIWG #StopEcocide #StopRacialGenocide #Canada #UK#ChangeTheSystemUKCA #DeceitUKCA #DeceptionUKCA #DistractionUKCA #SmokeAndMirrorsUKCA #ClimateJustice #ClimateCrisis #CostOfLivingClimateCrisis #CostOfLivingClimateJusticeSolutions