JOHNSON'S 'COVER-UP' JUSTICE FOR DAWN STURGESS Mother-of-three Dawn Sturgess died after coming into contact with the Russian nerve agent Novichok original image BBC
JOHNSON'S COVER-UP Indirect responsibility for murder of Dawn Sturgess original image Guardian Editorial 22 March 2023
Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson key responsibilities included National Security MI6 Intelligence Protection of UK Citizens International Relations. As PM misled Parliament about 'Partygate'. original image Guardian Editorial 22 March 2023
Overview of Johnson's 'Covered-Up' Evidence
The evaluation of Boris Johnson's interactions with Alexander Lebedev, a former KGB agent, raises significant concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and potential implications for British democracy. This situation is multifaceted, involving allegations of misleading public statements, lack of transparency, and possible Russian interference in UK politics.
Key Points of Concern
Misleading Public Statements:
Boris Johnson has faced scrutiny for his statements regarding his meetings with Lebedev. He admitted to a private meeting without officials present, which raises questions about the nature of their discussions and the potential for undisclosed government business. His assertion that he did not discuss government matters "as far as I am aware" has been met with scepticism, particularly given the context of his leadership during a time of heightened Russian influence.
Lack of Transparency and Accountability:
Johnson's failure to provide detailed accounts of his meetings with Lebedev has contributed to a narrative of secrecy and lack of accountability. Reports indicate that the relationship between Johnson and Lebedev could pose security risks, as former intelligence officials suggest that such interactions may align with Russian state interests [1] https://www.newstatesman.com/international-content/2022/07/christopher-steele-interview-boris-johnsons-secret-conversations-alexander-lebedev. This lack of transparency undermines public trust in leadership.
Potential Russian Interference:
The broader implications of Johnson's actions suggest a potential alignment with Russian interests, particularly in the context of the Brexit referendum. Some analysts argue that Johnson's leadership decisions may have inadvertently supported Russian objectives, contributing to an environment that could be seen as promoting an unfair and unfree referendum. This perspective highlights the potential for foreign influence in domestic political processes.
Erosion of Trust:
The combination of misleading statements, lack of transparency, and potential foreign interference contributes to a general erosion of trust in political leadership. The perception that Johnson's actions may have facilitated Russian interests raises serious questions about the integrity of British democracy and the accountability of its leaders.
Conclusion
The validity and reliability of the claims surrounding Boris Johnson's meetings with Alexander Lebedev are supported by a range of credible sources that highlight issues of transparency, accountability and potential foreign interference. The implications of these interactions extend beyond personal conduct, suggesting a broader narrative of failed leadership that could have significant consequences for British democracy. The ongoing discourse around these issues emphasises the need for greater scrutiny and accountability in political leadership, particularly in the face of foreign influence.’
Source: DeepAIChat https://deepai.org/chat
‘The summary of Boris Johnson’s alleged "covered-up" evidence centres on his secretive meetings with Alexander Lebedev, a former KGB agent and Russian oligarch, raising concerns about potential Russian interference in British politics. Key points include:
- Lack of transparency: Johnson reportedly made misleading public statements about these interactions, with insufficient transparency and accountability regarding his actions.
- Russian interference: Johnson's leadership is criticised for failing to respond adequately to Russian interference, particularly in the context of the 2016 Brexit referendum, which some suggest served Russian interests.
- Obstruction of justice and contempt of Parliament: His alleged obstruction of inquiries into these matters and disregard for parliamentary procedures highlight a broader erosion of democratic trust.
- Alignment with Putin's interests: Johnson's actions are seen as contributing to an environment that aligns with Putin's geopolitical objectives, undermining British democracy.
This creates a narrative of failed leadership, damaging public trust and enabling undue influence from foreign powers.’
Source: https://chatgpt.com/c/6714acfc-95b0-8003-9fde-e92dbd769be8 ChatGPT4o
‘There are several pieces of evidence and allegations that link Boris Johnson to secretive or unreported meetings with Alexander Lebedev, a former KGB agent and Russian oligarch. Here are the key points:
Meeting in Italy in 2018
- In April 2018, while Johnson was the Foreign Secretary, he attended a social event at a chateau owned by Evgeny Lebedev, Alexander Lebedev's son, in Perugia, Italy. Johnson admitted to meeting Alexander Lebedev without officials present during this visit. This meeting occurred just two days after a NATO foreign ministers' meeting in Brussels, where discussions centred around how to deal with Russia following the Salisbury poisonings [3][4].
Lack of Official Notification
- Johnson did not notify officials about his meeting with Alexander Lebedev. In a letter to the liaison committee of the House of Commons, Johnson avoided directly stating that officials were not informed of the meeting, instead using vague language to suggest that no government business was discussed, although he could not confirm this with certainty [2][4].
Security Concerns
- The meeting raised significant security concerns, particularly given the timing and the fact that Alexander Lebedev has been sanctioned by Canada for his close association with Vladimir Putin. Former MI6 officer Christopher Steele highlighted the potential national security risks posed by Johnson's unaccompanied meeting with Lebedev [3][4].
Regular Social Interactions
- Johnson has been regularly photographed at lavish parties hosted by the Lebedevs in London and Italy. These interactions have been described as close and frequent, with Italian intelligence officials expressing concerns about the nature of these gatherings, labelling them 'red-light' events due to their potentially compromising content [1][3].
Appointment of Evgeny Lebedev to the House of Lords
- Despite security service warnings, Johnson nominated Evgeny Lebedev for a seat in the House of Lords in July 2020. This appointment has been seen as another indicator of the close relationship between the Johnsons and the Lebedevs, raising further questions about potential conflicts of interest and national security risks [1][3].
These points collectively suggest that Boris Johnson had secretive or at least unreported meetings with Alexander Lebedev, which have raised significant concerns about national security and potential conflicts of interest.’
Citations:
[1] https://bylinetimes.com/2022/02/23/has-prime-minister-boris-johnson-been-compromised-by-russia/
[4] https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/labour-demand-investigation-boris-meeting-lebedev/
[5] https://theweek.com/news/politics/955416/timeline-downing-street-lockdown-party-scandal
Query: What evidence links Boris Johnson to secretive meetings with Alexander Lebedev?
Source: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/give-a-valid-and-reliable-expl-XV1I5yzVTImBbceRBk4ZTw#2
‘There are several pieces of evidence and allegations that highlight Boris Johnson's failed leadership in response to Russian interference in British politics and Putin's attacks on British democracy:
Failure to Investigate Russian Interference
- Despite repeated concerns about Russian interference in the 2016 EU Referendum, Johnson's government did not conduct a thorough investigation. The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) report on Russian interference, which was submitted to Johnson in October 2019, was delayed in its publication until after the 2019 general election. Johnson claimed this was due to "normal procedures," but critics argued it was a deliberate attempt to avoid scrutiny before the election [2][3].
Downplaying Russian Interference
- Johnson has consistently downplayed the threat of Russian interference in British politics. Even as Russia prepared to invade Ukraine, Johnson told the House of Commons that he had seen "absolutely no evidence of successful Russian interference in any electoral event" [1][2].
Lack of Action Against Russian Money and Influence
- Johnson's government, along with his predecessors, has been criticised for allowing Russian money and influence to flood into the UK. The 'golden visa' scheme, expanded by David Cameron in 2011, enabled Russian oligarchs to invest in the UK, potentially using their wealth as leverage against the government. This has made it difficult to impose effective sanctions on Russia, as much of the Russian money is tied up in British assets [1][3].
Secretive Meetings with Alexander Lebedev
- Johnson admitted to meeting Alexander Lebedev, a former KGB agent, without officials present in April 2018, just two days after a NATO foreign ministers' meeting discussing Russia's actions following the Salisbury poisonings. This meeting raised significant security concerns and questions about potential national security risks [4][5].
Appointment of Evgeny Lebedev to the House of Lords
- Despite security service warnings, Johnson nominated Evgeny Lebedev, Alexander Lebedev's son, for a seat in the House of Lords in July 2020. This appointment has been seen as another indicator of the close relationship between the Johnsons and the Lebedevs, raising further questions about potential conflicts of interest and national security risks [4].
Weak Sanctions and Compromised Response
- As Russian tanks prepared to roll into Ukraine, Johnson's government was criticised for having one of the weakest sanctions packages among NATO allies. This has been attributed to the deep connections between the UK's financial sector, the Conservative Party, and Russian oligarchs, which may have compromised the government's ability to take decisive action against Russia [1][3].
Criticism from Intelligence Experts
- Christopher Steele, a former MI6 officer, has raised serious concerns about the security risks posed by Johnson's unaccompanied meeting with Alexander Lebedev and the broader issue of Russian influence in the UK. Steele advocates for a more robust vetting system and greater scrutiny of high-profile Russians in the UK [4].
Calls for Investigation
- Labour leaders, including Angela Rayner and Yvette Cooper, have demanded a full investigation into the security risks and potential disclosure of sensitive information resulting from Johnson's meeting with Alexander Lebedev. They argue that if Johnson is found to have breached national security protocols, he should leave office immediately [5].
These points collectively indicate a pattern of failed leadership by Boris Johnson in addressing Russian interference in British politics, including a lack of decisive action, downplaying the threat, and maintaining close ties with individuals linked to the Russian state.’
Citations:
[2] https://time.com/5729984/boris-johnson-russian-interference/
[3] https://bylinetimes.com/2022/02/23/has-prime-minister-boris-johnson-been-compromised-by-russia/
[5] https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/labour-demand-investigation-boris-meeting-lebedev/
[6] https://www.csis.org/blogs/brexit-bits-bobs-and-blogs/did-russia-influence-brexit
Query: What evidence exists of failed leadership by Boris Johnson in response to Russian Interference in British politics and in particular Putin's attacks on British democracy?
Source: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/give-a-valid-and-reliable-expl-XV1I5yzVTImBbceRBk4ZTw#3
‘The allegations against Boris Johnson regarding his indirect responsibility for Dawn Sturgess's death, his actions and inactions in COP26, and the Brexit referendum do not directly link to the specific charges of misconduct, obstruction of justice, breach of duty, and contempt of Parliament in the way described below, but they do contribute to a broader narrative of failed leadership and potential cover-ups.
Indirect Responsibility for Dawn Sturgess's Death
While Boris Johnson was not directly responsible for Dawn Sturgess's death due to Novichok poisoning in 2018, his handling of the crisis as Foreign Secretary has been criticised. However, this incident does not directly tie into the allegations of misconduct, obstruction of justice, or contempt of Parliament. It does, however, highlight potential lapses in his leadership and response to critical national security issues, which can be seen as a breach of duty 2 4.
Actions and Inactions in COP26
The COP26 climate summit, hosted by the UK, was seen as an opportunity for global leadership on climate change. However, the summit received mixed reviews, with some critics arguing that it did not go far enough in addressing the climate crisis. Johnson's "10-point plan" for a "green industrial revolution" was announced before COP26, but critics argued it was insufficient to meet the UK's net-zero emissions target by 2050. This failure in effective climate leadership does not directly contribute to the specific allegations of misconduct or obstruction of justice but can be seen as a breach of duty in addressing a critical national and global issue 1.
Brexit Referendum and Russian Interference
The Brexit referendum in 2016 has been linked to allegations of Russian interference, and Boris Johnson's role in the Leave campaign has been scrutinised. Johnson's government was criticised for delaying the publication of a report on Russian interference in British politics, including the 2016 Brexit referendum, until after the 2019 general election. This delay raised concerns about political motivations and potential cover-ups, suggesting obstruction of justice and contempt of Parliament. Johnson's denial of any evidence of Russian interference despite the existence of a classified report further exacerbates these concerns 3.
Contribution to Allegations of Misconduct and Cover-Up
Misconduct in Public Office: Johnson's handling of the Novichok poisoning incident and his lack of decisive action against Russian interference can be seen as misconduct in public office, particularly if it is argued that he failed to protect national security and public safety adequately.
Obstruction of Justice: The delay in publishing the report on Russian interference and Johnson's denials of any evidence despite the report's existence suggest an attempt to obstruct justice and conceal information from the public and Parliament.
Breach of Duty: Johnson's failure to effectively address climate change through COP26 and his handling of the Brexit referendum in the context of Russian interference can be viewed as a breach of his duty to act in the best interests of the nation.
Contempt of Parliament: The delay in publishing the report on Russian interference and Johnson's evasive responses to questions about his meeting with Alexander Lebedev indicate a potential contempt of Parliament, as he may have deliberately misled or withheld information from lawmakers 2 3 4.
In summary, while the specific incidents of Dawn Sturgess's death, COP26, and the Brexit referendum do not directly prove misconduct, obstruction of justice, breach of duty, or contempt of Parliament, they contribute to a broader picture of Johnson's leadership failures and potential cover-ups. These incidents highlight issues with his handling of national security, transparency, and accountability, which are central to the allegations against him.’
Query: Explain how and why the evidence of Boris Johnson's indirect responsibility for Dawn Sturgess's death, his actions and inactions in the COP26 failure to effectively counter the 'evil oil leak' and a Brexit Referendum result in Putin's favour may significantly contribute to specific allegations of his cover-up of his misconduct, obstruction of justice, breach of duty, and contempt of Parliament whilst in public office.
Source: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/give-a-valid-and-reliable-expl-XV1I5yzVTImBbceRBk4ZTw#4
‘The evidence suggesting that Boris Johnson's actions contributed to an unfair and unfree Brexit referendum in 2016, which could be seen as promoting Putin's interests, is multifaceted and includes several key points:
Misleading Public Statements
- Boris Johnson, as a prominent figure in the Leave campaign, repeatedly made the false claim that the UK sent £350 million a week to the EU. This claim was widely criticised, including by the UK Statistics Authority, which labelled it a "clear misuse of official statistics" [1][5].
- The private prosecution brought by Marcus Ball alleged that Johnson knew these claims were false but made them anyway, which could be seen as misconduct in public office by misleading the public [1][2][5].
Lack of Transparency and Accountability
- Johnson's refusal to provide a written explanation for his claims when asked by Ball's legal team in November 2018 suggests a lack of transparency and accountability. This refusal was part of the basis for the private prosecution against him [1][2].
Potential Russian Interference
- Although the specific case against Johnson does not directly address Russian interference, there are broader concerns about Russian influence in the Brexit referendum. The delayed publication of the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) report on Russian interference in British politics, which was finally released in July 2020, suggested that Russian actors may have played a role in the referendum. Johnson's government was criticised for not taking adequate action to address this issue [3|.
- The ISC report highlighted that the UK government had not sought to investigate whether there was any Russian interference in the Brexit referendum, which could imply a breach of duty to protect the integrity of the democratic process.
Obstruction of Justice and Contempt of Parliament
- The attempt to prorogue Parliament in September 2019, which was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court, can be seen as an obstruction of justice and contempt of Parliament. This action was taken to avoid parliamentary scrutiny of Brexit plans, which aligns with the broader pattern of Johnson's actions to circumvent democratic processes [3][4].
General Erosion of Trust
- The cumulative effect of Johnson's actions, including the Partygate scandal, the unlawful prorogation of Parliament, and his handling of other controversies, has eroded public trust in his leadership and the democratic process. This erosion can be seen as a breach of duty to maintain public confidence in government and democratic institutions [3][4].
Alignment with Putin's Interests
- While there is no direct evidence that Johnson's actions were specifically intended to promote Putin's warlike ambitions, the overall context suggests that a divisive and destabilising Brexit process could align with Putin's strategic interests. Putin has been known to exploit divisions within Western democracies to further Russian geopolitical goals. The lack of robust action against Russian interference and the promotion of misleading information during the Brexit campaign could be seen as inadvertently or indirectly supporting these interests.
In summary, the evidence points to Johnson's misconduct in making false public statements, his lack of transparency and accountability, the broader context of potential Russian interference in the Brexit referendum, and his general pattern of obstructing justice and contempt of Parliament. These actions collectively contributed to an environment where the integrity of the Brexit referendum could be questioned, potentially aligning with Putin's interests in destabilising Western democracies.’
Citations:
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/29/uk/boris-johnson-faces-misconduct-trial-gbr-intl/index.html
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_v_Johnson
[5] https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/boris-johnson-combats-allegations-of-misconduct-in-public-office/
[6] https://www.swlondoner.co.uk/news/08072022-boris-johnson-a-timeline-of-the-pms-scandals
[8] https://bylinetimes.com/2022/02/23/has-prime-minister-boris-johnson-been-compromised-by-russia/
Query: What is the evidence that Boris Johnson's misconduct, obstruction of justice, breach of duty, and contempt of Parliament and the British public significantly contributed to an unfair, unfree Brexit referendum 2016 result that promoted Putin's warlike ambitions?
Source: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/give-a-valid-and-reliable-expl-XV1I5yzVTImBbceRBk4ZTw#6
‘To address the allegations and controversies surrounding Boris Johnson, here is a detailed analysis and chronological timeline of the key events, focusing on the specified points: Misconduct in Public Office, Obstruction of Justice, Breach of Duty, and Contempt of Parliament
Partygate Scandal
-May 2020:
- Boris Johnson attended a surprise birthday party in Downing Street, which was against the COVID-19 lockdown rules at the time [1][2][5].
- December 2020:
- Multiple lockdown-breaking parties took place in Downing Street, including a Christmas party on 18 December. Johnson later denied any knowledge of these parties despite evidence to the contrary [1][2][5].
- 30 November 2021:
- News reports emerged about the parties, leading to public outrage. Johnson instructed Simon Case to investigate, but Case was found to have attended one of the parties and was replaced by Sue Gray [1][2][5].
- 25 January 2022:
- The Metropolitan Police launched an investigation into 12 events, issuing over 100 questionnaires as part of Operation Hillman. Johnson welcomed the investigation but faced criticism for his earlier denials [1][2][5].
- 12 April 2022:
- Johnson was issued a fixed penalty notice for attending his birthday party, making him the first serving prime minister found to have broken the law while in office [1][2][5].
- 21 April 2022:
- The House of Commons passed a motion to refer Johnson to the Privileges Committee to investigate whether he had deliberately misled Parliament about his knowledge of the parties [1][2][5].
- May 2022:
- The Sue Gray report criticised the senior leadership at Downing Street and the Cabinet Office for "failures of leadership and judgement." The report supported the notion that Johnson had knowledge of the breaches and his denials were disingenuous [1][2][5].
- 23 May 2023:
- The Commons Privileges Committee concluded that Johnson had deliberately misled Parliament, which is a serious breach of parliamentary rules and amounts to contempt of Parliament[1].
Obstruction of Justice
- December 2021:
- It was reported that Downing Street staff shredded key documents and evidence about the parties before the Cabinet Office probe and police investigation, indicating an attempt to obstruct justice [2].
Breach of Duty and Contempt of Parliament
- The repeated denials and subsequent admissions of attending parties, despite initial claims that no rules were broken, demonstrate a breach of duty and contempt of Parliament. The Commons Privileges Committee's verdict that he deliberately misled Parliament supports this [1][2][5].
Secretive Meeting(s) with Alexander Lebedev
There is no substantial evidence provided in the sources to suggest that Boris Johnson had secretive meetings with Alexander Lebedev that are relevant to the allegations of misconduct, obstruction of justice, breach of duty, or contempt of Parliament.
Failed Global Leadership in Securing Peace Between Ukraine and Russia
While Boris Johnson's leadership during the Ukraine-Russia conflict is a subject of debate, the sources provided do not link this directly to the specific allegations of misconduct, obstruction of justice, breach of duty, or contempt of Parliament.
Indirect Responsibility for the Death of Dawn Sturgess by Novichok Poisoning
- 2018: The Novichok poisoning incident occurred during Johnson's tenure as Foreign Secretary, but there is no evidence to suggest he was directly responsible for Dawn Sturgess's death. He did not resign over this incident but later resigned as Foreign Secretary on 9 July 2018 due to disagreements with Theresa May's Brexit strategy [1][4].
Actions and Inactions in COP26, Brexit 2016 'Kremxit' Referendum
- Brexit 2016: Johnson was a key figure in the Leave campaign but this does not directly relate to the allegations of misconduct in public office or obstruction of justice.
- COP26: There are no specific allegations of misconduct related to COP26 that align with the charges of misconduct in public office, obstruction of justice, or contempt of Parliament.
Partygate
- As detailed above, the Partygate scandal is the most significant evidence of Johnson's misconduct, including breaking lockdown rules, lying about it, and attempting to cover up the events [1][2][5].
Russiagate
- There is no substantial evidence linking Boris Johnson directly to the 'Russiagate' scandal, which primarily involves U.S. politics and the Trump administration.
Betrayal of Voters' Trust and Breaking Own Rules
- The Partygate scandal is the most relevant here, as it involves Johnson and his staff breaking COVID-19 lockdown rules while the public was under strict restrictions. This betrayal of public trust was compounded by his denials and attempts to cover up the events [1][2][5].
Summary
The key evidence points to the following:
- Misconduct in Public Office: Johnson broke lockdown rules and lied about his knowledge of the parties.
- Obstruction of Justice: There were reports of Downing Street staff shredding documents related to the parties.
- Breach of Duty: Johnson failed to lead by example and adhere to the rules.
- Contempt of Parliament: Johnson deliberately misled Parliament about his knowledge of the parties, as concluded by the Commons Privileges Committee [1][2][5].
The other points mentioned, such as secretive meetings with Alexander Lebedev, failed global leadership, indirect responsibility for Dawn Sturgess's death, and actions in COP26 and Brexit, do not directly contribute to the specific allegations of misconduct, obstruction of justice, breach of duty, and contempt of Parliament related to the Partygate scandal.’
Citations:
[1] https://theweek.com/news/politics/955416/timeline-downing-street-lockdown-party-scandal
[4] https://www.swlondoner.co.uk/news/08072022-boris-johnson-a-timeline-of-the-pms-scandals
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Partygate
[8] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/01/scandal-timeline-tory-sleaze-boris-johnson
Links
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSqdjNhQHNkW2p6shDNbJn4NyEGBK9PujVyEjDK2YHcfIMk6NTgBiRY-olpphmLzVabB_ZVHLrZVApD/pub ‘Let’s just stick to the facts’ Johnson’s ‘Covered-Up’ Evidence: Boris Johnson’s secretive or unreported meetings with Alexander Lebedev, a former KGB agent and Russian oligarch; failed leadership in response to Russian interference in British politics and Putin's attacks on British democracy; contributing to a broader narrative of failed leadership; suggesting that Boris Johnson's actions contributed to an unfair and unfree Brexit referendum in 2016 which could be seen as promoting Putin's interests, is multifaceted and includes several key points: misleading public statements; lack of transparency and accountability; potential Russian interference, obstruction of Justice, contempt of Parliament, general erosion of trust and alignment with Putin's interests. #AI #Perplexity #DeepAI #ChatGPT4o Llewelyn Pritchard 20 October 2024
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSQfV8N0jLL24r7Bcdfgd_ZY8gVDhFT2829p0XvrJRUOBQVy9UNw_rmKLygYyltK6zqRzFST4ge7PFZ/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-legal-implications.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-legal-implications.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-legal-implications.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-legal-implications.html Johnson’s Cover-Up Legal implications: Misconduct in Public Office; Obstruction of Justice; Breach of Duty; Contempt of Parliament #AI #Perplexity #DeepAI #ChatGPT4o Llewelyn Pritchard 19 October 2024
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT-rVOBh9uvcIkvXRH37yO_xP_TFueZahtMQ8cS-AnrKgQXFXlpt6vEa1F46h5_cP3pliZvsa2x-SAJ/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/boris-johnsons-responsibilities-as.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/boris-johnsons-responsibilities-as.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/boris-johnsons-responsibilities-as.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/boris-johnsons-responsibilities-as.html Boris Johnson's Responsibilities as Foreign Secretary ‘As Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson had several key responsibilities that included National Security, Intelligence, Protection of UK Citizens and International Relations: #AI #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 14 October 2024 #JohnsonsCoverUp #ProtectionUKCitizens #IgnoredIntelligenceAdvice #RussianInterference #Corruption #Sleaze #Fraud #Crime #JohnsonLies #PeopleDie #JailTime
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQL6B3qOkq3OvmWsNnJhNjGGSnPccuc8IyFH1QoHgZ_LW6uG7n23_XwlNpIIvk-GA_6WW96bu2E8Mc0/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-uks-foreign-secretary.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-uks-foreign-secretary.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-uks-foreign-secretary.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-uks-foreign-secretary.html Johnson’s ‘Cover-Up’ UK's Foreign Secretary 13 July 2016 - 9 July 2018: significantly criticised for handling several key responsibilities of National Security and Intelligence, Protection of UK Citizens, International Relations and General Diplomatic Incompetence. #AI #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 15 October 2024
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQrs5PRwrn8csajpvEQul0xXbZMZ7xUXjXOXILhKHpK4I65q_1YAlVshlhFWNBlbvODduyNC66CY7fw/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-as-foreign-secretary.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-as-foreign-secretary.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-as-foreign-secretary.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-as-foreign-secretary.html Johnson's 'Cover-Up' as Foreign Secretary July 2016 - July 2018 included indirect responsibility for the death of Dawn Sturgess; failure to protect UK citizens; national security and Intelligence failures; weakness in national security infrastructure and Russian exploitation; shared responsibility and implications for national security; deteriorating international relations; general diplomatic incompetence #AI #Perplexity #ChatGPT #DeepAI Llewelyn Pritchard 15 October 2024
https://youtu.be/G9L7YLzNOJ8 https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTr9rabUzn2m_kcsSMnzMvujdRrg_OB_dUgTbt47nbJI9ihT1MFpxWWvt8s5r7BtJrl0P5ZY-6hz4_0/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-russian-partygate-this-is-much.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-russian-partygate-this-is-much.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-russian-partygate-this-is-much.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-russian-partygate-this-is-much.html JOHNSON'S RUSSIAN PARTYGATE → This is MUCH more serious than the Downing Street parties - Jon Danzig 17 June 2023 #Ukraine #Brexit #Referendum #RussianInterference #JohnsonLies #PeopleDie #Sleaze #Fraud #Crime #JailTime
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTxRUMTEIE3I_njNCTiO7nHuF2LBv3nD6u2y30AL_OScONaPyAupQj7TveJu87MQdUJltZqQkgJLUcP/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.html Johnson's ‘Cover-Up': Given Labour's mandate for change and the serious nature of the unethical behaviour, crime and treason allegations against Boris Johnson, investigating these issues is not just politically expedient but essential for the integrity of the UK's democratic institutions and national security. #AI #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 14 October 2024
https://www.dawnsturgess.independent-inquiry.uk/ THE DAWN STURGESS INQUIRY Public hearings will commence at the Guildhall in Salisbury from Monday 14 until Friday 18 October 2024. #JohnsonsCoverUp #Sleaze #Fraud #Crime #ECHR #GovernmentResponses #JohnsonLies #JailTime
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yXFGLRVD1pJN3hWySGJ3C8oFmkELlvYPVWx7YLSPV3g/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/09/will-dawn-sturgess-public-inquiry-terms.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/09/will-dawn-sturgess-public-inquiry-terms.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/09/will-dawn-sturgess-public-inquiry-terms.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/09/will-dawn-sturgess-public-inquiry-terms.html Will the Dawn Sturgess Public Inquiry Terms of Reference allow its Report intentionally omitting civil and criminal liability to be ‘spun’ into the Johnson Cover-up Story?
Consisting, at the very least of ‘Tory Sleaze’ unethical behaviour in office;
Ignoring his own agencies’ intelligence advice;
Breaching National Security in secretive meeting(s) with Alexander Lebedev, Perugia, Italy;
Media complicity for his own ends with Evgeny Lebedev; Russian Interference EU Referendum 2016;
Accepting Russian oligarch Conservative Party donations; ‘Constitutional Corrosion’ epitomised by ‘LondonGrad Laundromat’;
Enabling Putin’s Brexit by his failed leadership;
Interfering in an early, possible Russian-Ukraine peace deal; Purportedly supporting the welfare of Ukraine whilst more concerned about ‘saving his own skin’;
His Crony COVID Contracts and missing five COBRA meetings whilst otherwise distracted -
Becoming yet another example of unethical behaviour in the UK Government’s way of working? #AI #Perplexity #MoveOnNothingToSeeHere Llewelyn Pritchard 6 October 2024
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vShXTF9qTS964g23WpBbPCk7kE-uQiIGNEWKJ3PQrlYbXTHj4T_TPWH7Jyo1Wg67PYkpfGhoid0loke/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-in-what-sort-of.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-in-what-sort-of.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-in-what-sort-of.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-in-what-sort-of.html Johnson's ‘Cover-Up': In what sort of possible circumstances may 'Tory Sleaze' during government be termed 'fraud' 'fraudulent behaviour' or any other potential type of criminal activity? #AI #Perplexity #DeepAI #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 6 October 2024
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQ4mLpSPlG0cGz-RXCFa21Vo6AshonvWUwxydZu-o3TKvxiEp55ksNOwzw_1tTu-yEO6BLewd24Cg4_/pub JOHNSON DELAY ON RUSSIA DOSSIER HELPS PUTIN, SAYS LITVINENKO WIDOW wife of poisoned ex-spy warns of risks in suppressing report on UK interference. Luke Harding, Dan Sabbagh 5 Nov 2019 #JohnsonsCoverUp #Sleaze #Fraud #Crime #ECHR #JohnsonLies #JailTime